Questions encourage verbalization, but there are different kinds of questions.
[Questions encourage verbalization.
When I was being asked questions on Keichobot, I did indeed have the experience that "questions encourage verbalization".
I don't feel it is very beneficial in regards to the AI asking questions in Scrapbox.
Often delete the list of questions
Why or what is the difference between the two experiences?
Keichobot's question is always one of
It has the effect of narrowing the focus to it.
Entering the flow state by trying to answer the question
The effect is to keep thoughts from wandering off and to keep them connected to the theme.
Requires a statement of either "answer" or "make a decision not to answer" by being in the chat UI
AI questions that live in Scrapbox
Lots of it.
The question arises as to which to choose.
Sometimes very essential and difficult questions to answer.
I think this is a good thing.
I think it would be beneficial to try to answer
But it could take a year to get an answer.
Appearance and requirements do not match as interaction is designed
It appears over time, gradually accumulating related things, and at some stage they are connected and the answer is found.
Often ask stupid questions
'Smart' thinking with hooked brackets
Questions based on empty smarts that are superficially smart and have no core are so sterile that they are atrocious.
Maybe it's not a good idea to order them to ask questions.
I don't see any useful development from answering that question, so I'm not willing to devote the resources to answering it.
In actual use, I have found that I am more driven by "I see" or "No, that's not how I interpret it" when I see a description than when I am driven by a question.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/質問は言語化を促すが質問にも種類がある using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.